User talk:Gamonetus

Bodin page

I have started work on Jean Bodin. It looks like a long project. Charles Matthews (talk) 09:56, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The German language wikipedia section Life and Work (Leben und Schaffen) seems competent. I will translate it in the next few days, if you like. You are right that a figure of his stature needs more adequate coverage than he currently receives. Gamonetus (talk) 12:58, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That would be a start, certainly. I have more than enough material in fact - Quentin Skinner's Foundations has over 30 mentions, and those alone would take time to go through. My way of building up articles probably seems atomistic and non-linear, but I'm not going to apologise too much for it. The whole absolutism debate isn't something to rush at. As you'll notice, I believe in "naming names" first. Charles Matthews (talk) 14:29, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The biographical material from German wikipedia is strong, so I will go ahead and translate it. Do you want me to upload it, or to send it to you to integrate into your new material?Gamonetus (talk) 15:21, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It would be useful if you put it on the Talk page of the article, so that it can be integrated gradually (by anyone). It doesn't have the kind of inline referencing that is now considered de rigueur here (not that I think that deWP has that wrong for this kind of topic); and it also mixes the works and life in a way that doesn't scale up as well as separate sections, which are pretty obviously better for a writer who turned his hand to disparate subjects. Charles Matthews (talk) 19:15, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The translation from German is up now. It has a strong biographical narrative. Enjoy.

I am not an advocate of excessive inline referencing for basic factual information that is "encyclopedic". I concede that I have lost this battle on Wikipedia. Gamonetus (talk) 14:07, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I'll do more Bodin as time goes by. Charles Matthews (talk) 14:15, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it took my modem dying on Friday, giving me some compulsory offline days; but I managed to do the note-taking I wanted. I have put most of my first pass up now; also copied in the biography from the talk page; and have begun merging and copy editing and referencing. I can't say I'm pleased with the results yet: more work to do. But at least what is now up there may do the subject more like justice. Charles Matthews (talk) 20:03, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 17:21, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Page move

I have made the move to Konrad Pellikan, some time having passed. I haven't forgotten about Bodin, but I was working at Pierre Charron this morning, which was needy. Thanks for your input at editio princeps, by the way; that page is transformed now. Charles Matthews (talk) 14:43, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks.

Yes the editio princeps article has come a long way. User:Aldux has done most of the heavy lifting.

I have not forgotten about Jean Bodin either, but have been more interested in a few other issues of late including the Petri family. Gamonetus (talk) 02:41, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph Lortz

Thanks for your translation--you saved me the trouble! Did you see that the BBKL is no longer a free service? I guess I understand, but it's very unhelpful--and 300E is not cheap. Drmies (talk) 03:11, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The acknowledgment is appreciated. Crankiness often seems to overwhelm scholarly comradery on Wikipedia. Yes the loss of free BBKL is substantial. Gamonetus (talk) 14:03, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I'm plenty cranky. I've been writing up a bunch of those 19th and 20th century scholars, and fortunately their coverage is pretty good on the German WP, though their sourcing and formatting style lacks a bit compared to the English WP. I'm embarrassed to admit that I still haven't written up (or translated) Michael Tangl, even while I'm redlinking him all over the place. BTW, I'm pleased to see that the MGH is available online--how can they afford to do that? Hey, maybe you can answer a query: a couple of years ago I often used this database that listed the contents of thousands of German journals (for my purposes, tons of historical and religious journals--I don't know what their other coverage was). I can't remember if it was on a university's server or not--I want to say that there was mention of Stuttgart somewhere. Does this sound familiar to you? Thanks, Drmies (talk) 14:45, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Passionate Kisses"

The statements about the guitar riff that you added to the "Passionate Kisses" song article are WP:POV unless you can cite a source besides your own interpretation. But kudos for adding information about the Lucinda Williams' version.

-- J. Wong (talk) 23:40, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for adding the reference cite text, which I turned into a journal cite using information from here. I'm guessing that the Gurf Morlix guitar riff comment is also from this article? If so, cite it as well. Thanks. -- J. Wong (talk) 20:25, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ichthus: January 2012

ICHTHUS

January 2012

In this issue...

Ichthus is the newsletter of Christianity on Wikipedia • It is published by WikiProject Christianity
For submissions contact the Newsroom • To unsubscribe add yourself to the list here

Notifying user about missing file description(s) (bot - disable)

File:Schegk.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:Schegk.jpg

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 22:40, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 08:53, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Gamonetus. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Gamonetus. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Gamonetus. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Winter von Andernach.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Winter von Andernach.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Deadstar (talk) 21:02, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Gamonetus. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Xylander.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Xylander.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 01:57, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:27, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

References

I considered making the Gunnar Karlsson article a draft for being unsourced; the only reason I didn't, is because there are - apparently - sources on the Icelandic Wikipedia's article. Please integrate those into the text. Thanks. DS (talk) 23:15, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How did that turn out? He was a major figure and thus merits the article in English.

Have a good one. Gamonetus (talk) 23:46, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but you didn't show that. Not initially. Now you have. Good work. DS (talk) 02:45, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Neo-Latin

Heads up that I've added a move request to New Latin to become Neo-Latin. I'd be grateful if you could add your voice! Jim Killock (talk) 10:12, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I missed that. I am glad you won the Neo-Latin debate. Gamonetus (talk) 12:39, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]